Matter’s
levels of organization or stages of development constitute basic layers of
reality. Social layer is an emergence with new relations and many structures.
Society is an open system, i.e. a totality with the relations it contains.
Social relations have political, economic, governmental, legal, ideological and
cultural dimensions. The organization
and functioning of economic structure is not isolated and in isolation, but
interacts with other dimensions of social relations. Structures are the forms
of organization and functioning of relations between subjects/actors. The
practices of subjects take place under the conditioning of structures of a
certain organization and functioning. The organization and functioning of
structures change through the activities of subjects. The structure-subject
(agent) dichotomy in social science is actually the product of a kind of lack
of understanding/abstraction. In capitalist society, the power of the capitalist
class is formed and reproduced on a social scale. The social power of the
capitalist class is not achieved through state organization alone. There are
also economic, ideological (educational, communicative), cultural (literary,
artistic, sportive), civil society organizational (unions, associations,
foundations, etc.) dimensions of social domination/power. We call the
organizations that participate in the formation of the social power of the
capitalist class in all these dimensions and reproduce this power every day the
hegemony structures of social power. The capitalist state is an organization of
domination-subordination, in other words, of power relations between the
capitalist class on the one hand and the proletariat and intermediate layers on
the other. Legal structures are among the power organizations of the capitalist
class, the ruling class. In the communist society of future, the disappearance
of the state as an organization of political power, domination and oppression
will take place and the state will be identified with organized society.
Keywords: Dialectical-historical
materialism, realism, sociology, structure-agent dichotomy, superstructures,
hegemony, social power relations, communism
Introduction
Matter
has levels of organization or stages of development. We call these the basic layers of reality. These layers
are the atomic and subatomic particles (microcosm) layer, the chemistry layer,
which includes the interactions of atoms and molecules, the macrocosm
layer/physical layer, which includes the laws of motion of objects and energy,
the biological layer, which includes the structure of organisms and their
interactions with their environment, the mind/consciousness layer, and the
social layer, which includes changes and development in society. The basic
layers of reality exist within and rise above each other without forming a
hierarchy. One layer forms the ground for the other layer that covers it. It is
the structure of this more advanced level of organization, i.e. its functioning
and the interaction of its elements, that determines the essence of the
processes and events that take place in a more advanced layer that contains
sub-layers. For example, although the biological layer is a necessary basis for
the existence of the social layer, the “organization and functioning”
(structure) of the social layer cannot be explained by the laws of the
biological layer. We call the new qualities of the basic layers, which were not
present in the previous layers, “emergent”.
Society
is an emergence with new relations
and many structures (organization and functioning of relations) compared to
those in nature. Social relations are based on a biological foundation,
although they have different laws from those of nature or the biological level
of organization of matter. In explaining social phenomena, one must look at the
laws and relations that have emerged in the social layer of reality.
In
our view, society is an open system.
What is produced by labour applied to nature constitutes the basic inputs of
the social system. The processes of production are the indispensable,
constitutive and central component of social relations. The productive people,
means of production and land, know-how and forms of organization that make up
the productive forces have or are in certain relations of production. The
relations of production possessed by the productive forces, i.e. relations
between the classes in economy, constitute the economic basis or structure of
society. The organization and functioning of this economic structure is not
isolated and in isolation, but interacts with other dimensions of social
relations. The economic structure of society does not have a separate and
independent organization and functioning from the legal, governmental,
ideological/cultural and artistic dimensions of social relations that contain superstructures. Relations in production
processes are directly and indirectly influenced by other social processes and
relations that appear to be outside of production. The mode of production,
which is the economic structure, conditions the legal, governmental,
ideological/cultural and artistic dimensions of social relations to varying
degrees and limits the forms they can take. The fact that society is a system
means that it is a totality with the
relations it contains.
Class
relations and antagonism in the economic structure of society find their
reflections and echoes in ideological and organizational forms in other
dimensions of social relations. We call these organizations superstructures. This is what
characterizes superstructures.
The
state, everyday politics, political parties, dominant and official ideology,
legal regulations, cultural activities and organizations, etc., none of these
have a “positioning” that is external to the structure of production relations,
in other words, to economic relations between classes. These elements of the
capitalist social system interact with the base (i.e. economic structure) as
organizations, structures and practices in different dimensions of social
relations. The capitalist base cannot survive and develop without their
mediation. The relations between the base and superstructures should not be
explained by spatial constructions. In our view, social relations have
political, economic, governmental, legal, ideological and cultural dimensions. These dimensions do not
constitute a separate sphere, independent of the economic dimension of social
relations.
What is realism?
Scientific
research, which involves intellectual and practical activities, leads to
knowledge of objective reality. To the extent that scientific theories, laws
and knowledge accurately comprehend reality, they offer humanity the capacity
to change and control it. Scientific ideas that coincide with the tendency of
reality to change or that lead us to establish control over various sections of
reality are realist. There are different types of realism: philosophical,
scientific, political and in the ideas developed to solve problems in daily
life. Materialism is philosophical realism because it recognizes that objective
reality exists outside thoughts and can be abstracted with intellectual
accuracy. So materialism is realist because it says that reality can be understood
and controlled. Communism recognizes that the historical flow has not a goal
but a direction. It envisages the forms that trends from the past to the
present can take in the future. Since there is an intellectual overlap with
historical trends of change, communist ideas are realist in character. The
solution to the problems encountered in daily life can only be achieved by
remaining consistent with past knowledge and producing the realist ideas
necessary for the solution.
The
realist/scientific examination of a problem/topic only emerges when the
potential for establishing a practical control/dominance over the reality being
examined begins to emerge. If it is possible to establish at least some control
over the reality, process, phenomenon, object, etc. under scrutiny, a
realist/scientific abstraction can be made in this respect. This is, in fact,
the elimination of alienation.
In
their intellectual dimension, natural and social sciences, Marxism, historical
materialism and communism are realist theories and ideologies. Today, in
general, realism in the natural sciences is more advanced than realism in the
social sciences. Marxism is an important theoretical step towards the
establishment of control over social processes, which realistically grasps the
basic logic of the functioning of social reality in change, which is verified
in the process of revolutionary transformation in social reality. The realist
comprehension of social phenomena/processes by all people, at least at the
level of common sense, will be realized in the communist period of history.
This is possible only through a collective organization that will embrace
society/societies with all its members, through the equation of the state with
social organization, and through planned social engineering activities that
will ensure collective control and domination over social organization and
functioning (structures). Historical-dialectical materialism is a realist
philosophy, first, because it is compatible with scientific knowledge (natural and
social sciences) and abstracted from the sciences, and second, because it opens
up to communism. This characterization does not imply that the intellectual
content of materialism is realizable, but that as a philosophical attitude it
adopts the realism of scientific ideas and realism in general.
Structures and agents
Structures
are the forms of organization and functioning of relations between
subjects/actors. The organization and functioning within economic and political
organizations (e.g. an economic enterprise, party, state, family, etc.) formed
by subjects should also be seen as structures. In other words, structures do
not refer to state institutions, classes as static groups of people, written
legal regulations, or ideological doctrines. Let us take a closer look at what
is meant by structures...
The
state as the organization and active functioning of the social power relations
between the proletariat and the capitalist class (these relations have
economic, political, ideological, legal and cultural dimensions) within a
specific political organization is a superstructure.
Classes
are structures as the formation of relations and interactions between people
belonging to the main classes, including relations between their substrata.
The
organization and functioning of social relations in the economic dimension
constitutes the economic structure.
Another
superstructure refers to the legal dimension of the organization and
functioning of relations between classes and people.
The
regulatory mechanisms and relations (such as the family, the organization of
education, the culture industry) in the formation and re-formation of people's
attitudes, patterns of behaviour, feelings and thoughts about reality are
structures that also have an ideological dimension.
The
structure and the subject/agent are not distinct “elements” and there are no
external relations between them. Structures should be understood as the pattern
or form of organization and functioning of the relations/interactions that
subjects/agents and their organizations have.
The
structure-subject (agent) dichotomy in social science is actually the product
of a kind of lack of understanding/abstraction. If it is known that a
perspectival abstraction is made, with a “two-way” abstraction perspective, it
will be seen that there is no essential difference, separation and chronology
between structures and subjects. When this is not done, as a result of the
inadequacy and unidirectionality of abstraction/conceptualization processes,
subjects are reduced to structures, as in structuralism, and structures to the
activities of subjects, as in methodological singularism. However, structures
are the social forms that the relations of subjects take, and subjects are the
human activities that produce, reproduce or change these forms.
In
Marxist classical works, and even in different parts of a single work, there
are different shifts of emphasis towards human action/activities/practices or
structures as a result of perspectival abstraction. For example, capitalist production,
which is examined critically in Capital, is considered in terms of structure as
the organization and functioning of relations of production at different points
of abstraction, as well as the activity of capital and working class agents.
Structures
such as relations of production, classes, state, law, etc. should not be used
as static concepts. To take an example from Turkey, in the transition from the
pre-1980s to the post-1980s, the relations of production and class structure in
different capital accumulation processes have had a dynamic structure as
superstructures, real, effective relations, and the form of organization and
functioning of these relations.
The
practices of subjects take place under the conditions of structures of a
certain organization and functioning. At the same time, the organization and
functioning of structures change through the activities of subjects, which are
conspicuously evident in certain historical episodes. These are the times when
reforms are implemented, when social revolutionary moves are made.
Politics and the state
Politics,
as a dimension of social relations, must be seen to include certain
practices/actions and structures (the state, political parties, etc.) within
its scope, and to exist through interactions within the totality of social
relations.
Political
practices are both voluntarist practices and are conditioned by structural
elements such as the state, parties, mechanisms such as elections, trade
unions, workers' associations and cultural organizations, which are
organizations of struggle but have moved away from it, and the structuring of
inter-class relations. Political practices are realized in interaction with the
structures of different dimensions of social relations, changing them, but
within the limits and constraints set by them. All political activities of
subjects with their differences, these subjective activities, are in fact
components of objective processes.
The
capitalist state can be an organization with a pronounced economic organization
in the form of a welfare state, or on the contrary, it can be a neo-liberal
authoritarian security state with a much reduced organization. But it is always
an organization that affects all other social relations, including economic
relations. The struggles between the capitalist class and the proletariat are
reflected in the structure of the capitalist state. Moreover, this state is an
organization in which the struggle between classes takes place, with
politicians and bureaucracy with ideological commitments to the capitalist
class and the official ideology it produces on the one hand, and the large mass
of working people working within it on the other. The education structure,
which has the function of training new workers and ideologically forming them in
accordance with the system, and the health organization, which is in charge of
the reproduction (healing) of the workers themselves, are also social relations
that the capitalist state embodies to a large extent in the social state type
and to a lesser extent in the neo-liberal state type.
The
capitalist state is an organization of domination-subordination, in other
words, of power relations between the capitalist class on the one hand and the
proletariat and intermediate layers on the other. The capitalist state is
predominantly an organization of political power, but it is also an
organization of power with its economic, ideological, cultural, military-police
and legal organizations. For example, there are hierarchical power relations
between the conscripts and privates of the army, who are predominantly workers
and peasants, the officers, who are wage labourers because they sell their labour
power, and the broad mass of the police and the military-police bureaucracy,
and this is domination as a type of power relation. The institutions of the
state are the organizations that contain the power relations between the
politicians-bureaucracy and the public workers.
Legal structure
The
function of the legal dimension of social relations is to regulate social relations
with its theoretical (laws, constitution, legislation) and practical aspects.
These regulated relations also include economic practices.
The
legal dimension of social relations includes legal practices and relations and
norms (rules) that regulate people's behaviour/actions. Legal practices and
relations are constituted by the legal subset of the state, which is an
organization of power (judicial processes in courts, prisons, etc.). Law, as
one of the superstructures, has a certain organization and functioning, in
other words structure. The acts and
transactions of individuals and legal entities in capitalist societies are
regulated by legal structures and rules. Unlike other rules, for example
technical regulatory rules or moral norms, in the processes of regulating the
behaviour and actions of individuals, organizations, institutions, the legal
structure constitutes an alienated sphere of power (not under the control of
people). The legal structure is an organization of power that ensures the subordination
of workers to the social domination of capital through the state's practices of
repression and coercion, the ideology of law, and the dominant moral
understanding of rights and justice in society.
Legal
structures are among the power organizations of the capitalist class, the
ruling class. In this power organization, ideological values produced through
legal practices are at work in addition to oppressive practices/domination.
Legal practices (legislative practices as well as judicial practices) result
not only in sanctions/repression but also in the establishment of ideological
hegemony (approval and consent) over people.
Ideological and cultural dimensions of social relations
Everything
solid is evaporating!... Cultural values and practices of past centuries are
dying out in the grip of market relations, undergoing metamorphosis and being
replaced by new ones. In the reality of living active individuals as patterns
of emotion, thought and behaviour, ideologies manifest themselves as ideological
motives, attitudes and behaviours not only in production processes but also in
different social practices and relations. Ideological feelings and thoughts,
attitudes and behaviours, which are reproduced every day, maintain their
dynamism within the social system/whole with the changes in one side or the
other of social relations.
Today,
art and sporting activities are in the web of capitalist production and market
relations. As components of the culture industry, artistic production and
sporting activities are also sites of ideological struggles with the social
relations and practices they embody. As in artistic productions and activities,
inter-ideological struggles are also observed in the social relations shaped
around sporting activities. In art, practices and activities that glorify the
status quo and backwardness are opposed to critical and developmental
productions and activities. While the participation of working people in
artistic production remains very limited, during the consumption of industrial artistic
products and activities, ideological manipulation takes place for the formation
of a hegemony that establishes and reproduces the social power of the
capitalist class. Leaving aside the amateur participation of workers in
sporting activities, it is seen that the social function of the relations woven
around these practices is to contribute to the formation of the hegemony
necessary for the social power of the capitalist class.
Hegemony structures of social power
In
capitalist society, the power of the capitalist class is formed and reproduced
on a social scale. The social power of the capitalist class is not achieved
through state organization alone. There are also economic, ideological
(educational, communicative), cultural (literary, artistic, sportive), civil
society organizational (unions, associations, foundations, etc.) dimensions of
social domination/power. In the relationship established between workers and
bosses on the scale of enterprises, there is not only an economic and legal
relationship, but also a sovereignty-subordination relationship. The education
system and the media contain practices and interpersonal relations that
participate in the formation of the hegemony necessary for the social power of the
capitalist class. Trade unions, as corporatist organizations that reconcile the
interests of the working class with those of the state and the bosses, ensure
the attachment of workers to the capitalist system, and so on... We call the
organizations that participate in the formation of the social power of the
capitalist class in all these dimensions and reproduce this power every day the
hegemony structures of social power.
Hegemony
is realized through compulsion and coercion, fear, intimidation, ideological
approval, consent and attachment, distraction and occupation. The TV series
that working people watch, the best-selling books they read, the tabloid press
and various hobbies they engage in in their non-working time can be given as
examples for the production of consent and “distraction and occupation”. The
social power of the capitalist class is ensured and reproduced through the
hegemony established. Through various social processes, organizations and
productions, the social power of the capitalist class is established and
re-established.
The
power/dominance relations between the capitalist class and the proletariat and
other social segments exist in ordinary times in the form of the masses'
dependence on the system and their immobilization under hegemony. In everyday
life there is a dynamic equilibrium in these power relations. For example, with
a strike in an enterprise, the balance in the power relations between the boss
and the workers is temporarily disrupted as a result of the transformation of class
antagonism into active struggle, in other words, into contradiction. In a
cross-section of a nationwide revolutionary situation, the hegemony over the
working masses disintegrates and cannot be reproduced. This is called a crisis
of hegemony. The death knell of the social power of the capitalist class has
sounded. The masses participating in
the revolution have alternative organizations and political parties and
counter-hegemonic means (e.g. trade unions, associations, foundations, media,
cultural organizations, etc.). The revolution does not take place in the form
of the working class seizing political power from outside through its party. In
a historical episode characterized by a crisis in which the social power of the
capitalist class cannot be reproduced, political power passes from the
capitalist class to the proletariat with the support of the instruments of
social counter-hegemony. The existing social and political power disintegrates
and the masses form their own power through newly developed alternative power
organizations and the vanguard party. It is seen that new power sprouts out of
the cracked old power structure.
Communist society
All
the epochs of humanity from prehistory to the present day, viewed in
retrospect, are the evolution of communities on their way to becoming
societies. The differences (language, religion, culture, etc.) between the
communities called nations, which today are citizens of different
nation-states, will continue to evolve
in interactions as social riches once the compartmentalization of capital power
over these communities on the scale of countries is eliminated. Communist
society includes all the people of the world and is built on a world scale. The
potential world society of the capitalist era will be realized when national
and nation-state borders cease to be a hindrance.
Since
the class determination of social relations will cease to exist under communism,
the relations of political sovereignty and rule observed between people in this
period of history will also cease to exist. This means the disappearance of the
state as an organization of political power, domination and oppression. Under
socialism, the state will gradually abandon this old function. Only when the
state as a political organization becomes the organizational form of all social
life it will wither and dissolve into
society. The state(s) will gradually come to perform the objective social
work that people living all over the world collectively organize and take under
their control. Tasks within the scope of social
engineering, such as planning, realizing production processes, meeting
needs, educating younger generations, caring for the elderly and disabled,
supporting the renewal of the environment, etc., will be carried out by an
organization that includes everyone. In short, while as the organization of
domination and political apparatus the state/states fades and dissolves within
society, an organizational structure will gradually be created that encompasses
all of humanity. The state/unity of the states will become the organization of
society encompassing all humanity. The
state will be identified with organized society.
The
extinction of law under socialism means that the domination and ideological
function of law will disappear over time (for example, under socialism,
housing, education and health are rights and legally expressed as such, but
according to the capitalist class they are not rights in today's capitalist
system). In the abundant society of communism, where people's needs are
adequately met, where there is maximum equality of access to all opportunities
for everyone, including the disabled, where people have control over their living
conditions, that is, where they are free from alienation, there is no talk of
justice and rights. Law no longer has any ideological function other than being
the written record of the principles of the functioning of society and the
scientifically regulated social relations. Under communism, the legal
structure, as a simple and natural (non-alienated) social organization, deals
only with the individual/psychological causes of crimes and functions in a
pedagogical-medical way, since the social causes of crimes have disappeared.
The
relations of production are not the “cause” and superstructures are not the
“effect”. There are no cause and effect relations between the base and
superstructures, between the mode of production and other aspects of social relations.
In the communist world society, as in all history, artistic, philosophical,
scientific, ethical and aesthetic productions will be created in accordance with the relations of
production. In communist society, due to the absence of class antagonism in the
relations of production, artistic, philosophical and materialist dialectical,
scientific, moral, ethical and aesthetic productions, values and principles
will not be diminished.
Today,
scientific activity takes place predominantly as R&D activities in the
context of production processes. Moreover, inter-class relations and struggles
are not reflected in the content of scientific-technological products and
knowledge/theories in the natural sciences. It is therefore absurd to speak of
a “proletarian science” or a “bourgeois science”. On the other hand, just as
metaphysical ideas and idealist philosophical views once dominated the natural
sciences in their birth and infancy, today in the field of human/social
sciences there are struggles between various ideologies masquerading as science
and scientific approaches. A gradually developing realism in the social
sciences will be the product of the opening communist era, and will reach a
certain maturity with the increasing control of people collectively over social
processes.
The production and reproduction of metaphysical ideologies, on the other hand, will come to an end as alienation in relations with nature and other human beings is eliminated, as these relations become transparent, easy to understand and collectively controllable.
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder
Google hesabıyla yorum yapmak istemiyorsanız, yorum yazmadan önce Ad/Url seçeneğinde, sadece ad kısmını doldurabilirsiniz.